Well, the store officially reached 1,000 reviews. Pretty awesome stuff if you ask me. The store has come a long way since it first got started.
Well, the store officially reached 1,000 reviews. Pretty awesome stuff if you ask me. The store has come a long way since it first got started.
I honestly don’t see how anyone is buying this nonsense. Today while on my lunch break at work, the break room was in an uproar of excitement as we all watched a tacky CGI rendering of a rocket reaching out beyond the exosphere.
It literally was a cartoon.
And yet, as if what they were seeing was live footage, my co-workers were ecstatic to see in amazement as some silly billionaire spent trillions of dollars on nothing,rather than using that money for the betterment of those on the ground that could use the help.
But, that isn’t the part that irks me. The fact that what I was seeing was blatantly CGI being so easily garnished as fact by those around me in the break room was what rattled me.
With that, you can actually go watch the live feed of this car floating in space. If you look at this and tell yourself that it is real, then good for you. My only question is this… how long until we get a shot of it from the ISS? Bound to happen just about the time everyone on earth forgets the car all together. Just look at these images from the live feed.
I mean, really… a monkey with a space helmet is the logo for crying out loud.
Where are the satellites? Where is all that space junk? Where is the ISS? Whatever… And in closing, all I can say to all of this is as follows.
Matthew 24:24 – For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect.
2 Thessalonians 2:9 – that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders.
Revelation 13:13-14 – He performs great signs, so that he even makes fire come down out of heaven to the earth in the presence of men.
We really are in that period of time, people. We really are.
But, don’t listen to me. I’m ignorant.
So, how do I know this is a joke?
Well… you honestly expect me to believe that one entire side of the earth has zero land mass?
So… Google is finally bringing augmented reality functionality to Chrome for those of you that seem to think something like that is useful. And, of course… you can’t help but see the irony in the fact that they chose (of all things) an astronaut for public demonstration.
Quote: “The unique power of AR is to blend digital content with the real world. So we can, for example, surf the web, find a model, place it in our room to see just how large it truly is, and physically walk around it.”
That one time Don Pettit’s coffee came out of the bag on the ISS.
Seems legit… green screen?
I don’t know about you, but just like with most things, it seems to me like the powers that be have had access to this sort of thing for while now. And it is just now reaching the general public. With that said, there is coming a day when the deception will be so strong that no one, and I mean no one… will be able to tell the difference.
2 Thessalonians 2:7-12 – For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
It’s coming, people.
Well, as usually… let’s leave it to the space artists to tell us what is actually going on above us.
Or better yet, these scientific “renderings” that clearly show a spec, which explains that massive rock art above.
Same fake nonsense. Just a different day.
On Monday, August 21st we have the Great American Eclipse happening. It is a pretty exciting thing indeed to have such an event taking place across the entire continent of North America. With that in mind, I have been thinking on it quite a bit… and honestly, I have one major question.
But, before I ask my question we need to clarify how it all works. Bear with me for a moment while I try to elaborate on what we need to know to grasp how these bodies orbit or spin in relation to one another. Hopefully this is written in a way that it isn’t too hard to follow.
So… here we go.
To make one complete rotation in 24 hours, a point near the equator of the earth must move at close to 1,000 miles per hour (1,600 km/hr). The speed gets less as you move north, but it’s still a good clip throughout the United States. With that being the case, for simplicity sake, we will say that the earth spins at 1,000 miles per hour while making one full revolution within a 24 hour period. Within the course of one full rotation, the earth spins a total of 24,000 miles in 24 hours (seems simple enough).
The Moon orbits the earth at a speed of 2,288 miles per hour (3,683 kilometers per hour). During this time it travels a distance of 1,423,000 miles (2,290,000 kilometers) for one full revolution. The sidereal month is the time it takes to the moon to make one complete orbit around Earth. This is about 27.32 days. The synodic month is the time it takes the Moon to reach the same visual phase. This varies notably throughout the year, but averages around 29.53 days.
This would mean that one full revolution for the moon takes close to 27 or 30 full 24 hour periods. This would then further imply that the earth would in essence spin on its axis a total of 27 to 30 times while the moon itself completes one single revolution. In other words the moon during one full 24 hour period would have traveled only a total of 54,912 miles. This is roughly 1,368,088 miles shy of completing one full revolution.
To better grasp what I am getting at, the following video is a great animated visualization of these two bodies and their respective speeds of motion (the earth spinning on its axis and the moon orbiting the earth). This video makes it seem a lot less complicated than I just did, for sure.
In this video you will notice that both bodies are moving from West to East. The earth spins on its axis in an eastward direction. The moon orbits the earth in an eastward direction as well. With that in mind, both of these objects move from west to east in their respective speeds. This is something we can all agree upon I hope. The earth is going one speed. The moon is going another speed. They both travel in the same direction.
Seems simple enough…
There is however a major error that occurs when you consider the two speeds and the fact that the earth is generating a full revolution at more than 27 times that of the moon’s speed. As a result, although the Moon is moving to the east relative to the earth, the much faster westward motion of the sky is carrying it to the west, so despite its eastward motion relative to the center of the Earth, it rises in the east and sets in the west, just like any other celestial body.
To better grasp what I am rambling about, go back and watch that video again. You will notice that although the earth and moon are both traveling eastward, the earth’s greater speed is causing the moon to appear to travel east to west rather than west to east in relevance to the observer from ground level on the earth.
The point here is simply this; although the moon travels from the west in an eastward direction, the earth spins so fast that it causes the observer from ground level to see the moon traveling backwards from east to west instead. With this in mind, go back and watch the animation one last time to see what I am talking about.
Now, assuming that I haven’t lost you… here is the question.
Despite the fact that both the earth and the moon are traveling from west to east, the relative motion of both bodies causes the moon to appear to be traveling backwards from east to west. If this is the case (which it is) please… someone explain to me how in the world is the Great American Eclipse on the 21st is apparently occurring from West to East?
This absolutely defies the Copernican Principle.
Again, if the moon due to relativity appears to the observer to be traveling from east to west, how in the world is this eclipse happening from west to east? Someone, please explain to me how this doesn’t totally disprove the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution?
This eclipse is only going to last like 4 hours across the United States. But before we look at the math behind this… let’s let Neil Degrasse Tyson explain real quick how math surpasses our senses. Don’t trust what you can see, touch, or feel… No, instead, trust the math.
With that in mind, let’s look at some math real quick. In order for the moon to defy our senses, no longer appearing to travel from east to west despite the fact that it supposedly isn’t, it would inevitably need to somehow speed up and begin traveling in an eastward direction faster than that of the earth’s spin.
And since it will only take 4 hours for the moon to cross North America on the 21st, this would then mean that the moon is somehow no longer traveling (according to math) 1,423,000 miles in the course of 720 hours. No, instead… on the 21st it will magically have sped up from 2,288 miles per hour to a whopping 69,644 miles per hour so as to defy the east to west observational conundrum.
Hhhmmmmm… I don’t know why, but this bible verse seems to come to mind.
And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; – Luke 21:25
Who are we kidding though, I am clearly just ignorant.
To the average observer here on earth the moon travels from east to west. But, on the 21st it will be doing its own thing. Don’t worry about it. Just let the math do the talking. Like Neil Degrasse Tyson said, we can’t trust what we see anyway. The science guys will explain this one away. Keep on letting them do your thinking for you.
What does NASA have to say?
Whatever… rant over.
Space is fake.
As some of you already know, I have a lot of questions about science, cosmology, and what we are told about the physical properties of physics and nature. With that in mind I was totally blown off guard when my wife showed me the number bellow. You better believe I instantly dialed the number and ran through a series of questions.
Sadly, they were unable to answer any of my questions. With that said, here were the questions that I asked.
1.) How is it possible for the Polaris Star to be stationary in the night sky while the earth travels through space in five directions at once? The earth spins on its axis, goes around the sun, the sun around the Milky Way, the Milky Way through space, while the earth also apparently pivots its axis making the north pole change locations every 27,000 years (despite this last one having never been observed).
2.) Since the earth is spinning at more than 1,000 MPH at the equator… how is it that sound at the equator is possible? The speed of sound is a little more than 700 MPH. And with that in mind the sound wave would never catch up to the earth at the equator, causing it to be a dead zone of silence.
3.) If the earth is spinning at the equator at more than 1,000 MPH wouldn’t the basic laws of physics as a result of the angular momentum cause the wind to only travel in one direction?
4.) The ISS (International Space Station: NASA) is flying over our heads at more than 7,000 MPH. That speed equates to nearly 50 MPS. With that in mind, it is traveling at nearly 3 times faster than the speed of sound. How can they hold a conversation?
5.) We are told by NASA that the ISS and most satellites exist in or beyond the exosphere. We are also told by NASA that these manmade objects have an exterior made of aluminum. Here is why I have a problem with that… the exosphere is more than 3,000 degrees. The melting point of aluminum is only 1,200 degrees. Since the exosphere is twice what these objects can withstand, how are they up there?
Basically what this comes down to is that I am going to save this number… because, let’s face it. I have tons of questions and no real answers. And I shamefully admit it… I got way too much out of it. I enjoyed hearing the person on the other line scratching their head… because, with questions like these… I seem to do a lot of that these days.
Earth’s orbital plane is known as the ecliptic plane, and Earth’s tilt is known to astronomers as the obliquity of the ecliptic, being the angle between the ecliptic and the celestial equator on the celestial sphere. Earth currently has an axial tilt of about 23.4°.
An axial plane is based on the 90° pivot. With that in mind I find it rather strange to consider that the opposing tilt of the earth equates to a rather interesting number. What I mean by that is this; if we were to subtract 23.4° from 90°, we get exactly 66.6°.
What a wonderful coincidence.
But, it doesn’t stop there. According to Live Science, we are also carrying a velocity of roughly 66,600 MPH as we fly through space around the sun.
What another wonderful coincidence.
Or even better… what about the fact that the curvature of the earth for one mile squared equates to exactly 0.666 ft. If you don’t believe me you can do the math yourself using this program.
I bet, if you decided to not stop there and continued to look at the math behind how the secular world describes their godless creation, the coincidences wouldn’t stop here.
But then again, who are we kidding… right? I clearly am just ignorant.
If you want to believe you are flying through space at 66,600 miles per hour around the sun while on an opposing tilt of 66.6° with a radial drop of 0.666 ft per mile squared under your feet, you go right head.
I think I’ll put my feet on the bible instead of the wisdom of secular men, thank you very much.
1 Chr. 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”
Ps. 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm …”
Ps. 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable …”
Now, don’t get me wrong… I do realize that there are plenty of verses that suggest the world does move. For example:
Ps. 99:1: “The Lord reigneth … let the earth be moved.”
Job 26:7: “He … hangeth the earth upon nothing.
Is. 24:19: “the earth is moved exceedingly.”
With that in mind I am neither arguing for or against the motion of the earth. All I am getting at here is the simple fact that we are so quick to settle on the side of the secular world when it comes to Biblical creation. If we are so quick to stand up against things like the theory of evolution, why then would describing the creation of earth and the celestial bodies above be any different? Rather than standing on the truth of God’s word, we have given the Biblical attributes of cosmology over to the wisdom of men, diminishing that portion of the Bible to allegory rather than truth.
Just think about it.
If Satan really is in charge right now, and his goal is to deceive men into believing that God does not exist, the quickest way to do something like that would be to distort their view on creation itself.
But… I digress.
I’m clearly just ignorant. All of those numbers above are clearly just a coincidence.
Whatever… if you want to be asleep, at this point you are doing it by choice. The great deception is at hand.
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. – Revelation 12:9
Please note that it doesn’t say he will deceive some, or just the unbelievers. No… it says all.
Anyway, I’m ignorant.
Talk to you later.
Well, today is my birthday. And to celebrate my birthday, Sarah and I went all the way out to the McDonald Observatory in West Texas. This place is in the middle of nowhere up on top of some pretty epic mountains. Today, while we were there we not only got to visit the actual telescopes (one of which I had the pleasure of personally controlling manually), but we also observed the sun.
It was a pretty cool experience and I have to admit, the scenery on the way there was breathtaking.
But, I will say… there is one thing that today’s trip got me thinking about. First off, the Polaris Star (also known as the North Star) is stationary in the night sky. I asked the tour guide how it was possible for the North Star to be stationary in the night sky while we traverse the void of space in four directions at once. He managed to not grasp what I was actually asking, and instead mentioned a 5th motion that he posed does change the North Star dramatically. Not only has this motion of Polaris never been observed in the last 6,000 years of recorded cosmology, but it apparently happens every 27,000 years. Again, something that can’t be observed. Makes sense to me.
How can we state a fact like that without the ability to actually observe it? Seems like science… lol.
But, anyway… that isn’t what this blog is about. This blog is about the sun… because, at the end of the day that was what the main part of the tour was about.
So… according to modern day astronomy the sun is a star. Not only that, but it is one of the smallest stars. According to this same modern day teaching of the cosmos the sun was formed prior to the earth and is currently 93 million miles away.
So then… why is it that everything we are taught about the cosmos today is absolutely backwards from what the bible says? According to the bible the earth was made first (not the sun). The Sun and moon were made separate from the stars (meaning the sun is not a star). The sun and moon are both called great lights (according to the Copernican Principle our sun is not great when compared to other stars). The bible also says that the sun, moon, and stars all exist inside of the firmament. And that this firmament is where the birds fly.
So then, which is true?
Are we to believe as Christians that the bible is the inerrant truth (except when it talks about science, which makes it no longer inerrant)? Or, are we going to believe the cabalistic indoctrinations of the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution?
Rather than being long winder, trying to make a lot of points (which I feel I could easily do) I want to just leave you with this thought.
Why is it that literally everything we are told about the cosmos is the exact opposite of what the bible says?
Anyway, my birthday trip was fun. Space exploration is fake. The sun, moon, and stars are close and small. Satellites do not exist beyond the stratosphere (all we are ever shown is CGI and cartoons).
The earth is motionless. I know this to be true because that is what my senses tell me and that is what my bible tells me.
The earth was made first. The one way speed of light is assumed. With that said, everything you have been told about the cosmos is an assumption.
Have a good day, and thanks for reading. For my birthday, my challenge to you is to go back and read what the bible says about the cosmos. What it has to say is very clear… very clear indeed.
I have a lot of friends both Christian and non-Christian alike that love NASA. They love science and space exploration. They love learning about black holes, gas giants, and all the cool things NASA constantly puts out. I used to be like that too. But, the one thing that these two groups of people will disagree on is creation. The idea of God creating all things against the idea that it all started from nothing is a big debate. And today, many Christians side with the nothingness theory as if it were proven true, but still insist that God inspired the nothingness to create everything regardless of the fact that this concept goes against scripture.
And the pioneer of these epic discoveries just so happens to have no agenda at all. NASA is neither secular or Christian. Their agenda is clearly just one of science and the pursuit of knowledge… nothing more. Nothing less. That is one thing that both sides of the NASA fandom will agree on. NASA doesn’t have an agenda toward or against spiritual matters.
I am sorry, but I disagree with that entirely.
If they are known for being so none bias, then why is every single mission that they do related to pagan gods, Gnosticism, the occult, or outright luciferian concepts? And as of yesterday, we have yet again another example of this very thing to pile atop the countless other examples.
Meet Lucy, the mission that is apparently sending us to the Trojan Asteroids of Jupiter.
Let’s totally set aside the fact that once again we are presented with nothing more than fake CGI junk rather than something tangible and real. Let’s stop and take a look the subliminal meanings behind this mission. And, in turn consider how NASA truly is none bias… or not.
The first thing to consider is the destination. We are sending a probe to a cluster of rocks known as Trojans. A Trojan by definition is a tool used to mislead large groups of people against the devices true intent. Secondly, we should stop and look at how and why the project was given its name; Lucy.
The name Lucy is derived from a Latin word, Lucius, meaning light. This explains why Satan is also known as Lucifer… also meaning light. And since the promises of Satan were transcendence and illumination, it is no wonder the movie Lucy was given such a name when evaluating what it was about (transcendence).
This patch symbolizes exactly the stance that NASA has on spiritual matters. With that in mind, I do not understand how so many Christians can so quickly rally behind this organization. Here, in this patch we have Lucy, the monkey skeleton… which stand on the bases of the evolution of mankind from primates to humans. Secondly, we have the rocks next to the probe. When compared to the ape bones to the probe we can see that it implies our evolutionary transcendence via the promises of Lucifer through knowledge and technology… who just so happens to hold the exact same meaning in his name as the word Lucy on the patch.
To make things even more interesting, the name of this NASA probe project was derived from the Beatles and a song called “Lucy in the sky with diamonds“. I could honestly rant on this fact forever. With that in mind I will simply point out that the album that this song appears on is heavily tied to LSD and Alice in Wonderland… which implies higher states of copiousness (Lucy being a great title since it means what it means). Enough said.
So… why the diamond? Could it possibly be because it ties so well with the rest of the theme? I bet that could be the case. The diamond shape symbolizes ascension, clarity, and wisdom in many cultures.
With that said, here we have NASA propagating evolution to the masses, honoring Lucifer for his light of promising ascension, clarity, and wisdom through a band that is heavily associated with the occult. While at the same time admitting to your face that it is nothing more than a Trojan meant to mislead the masses, which is exactly what it is doing.
You want to keep believing in their fake CGI nonsense, you go right ahead.
As for myself, I will stick with the scriptures and the true scientific method. I don’t know. I guess I’m just ignorant, but a $19 billion dollar budget doesn’t automatically make your NASA cartoon truth. It is still just a cartoon.
And at the end of the day, I don’t care what you believe in… one thing is clear. NASA does promote a spiritual agenda weather you admit it or not. Just go back and look at the names of all their past missions.
There is a point when you could consider it all to be coincidence. But, let’s face it. We have been beyond that point for quite some time now.